A chapter has closed in the story of Anton Rapati, convicted sex offender, with charges being stayed by the Crown prosecutor's office see below.
Readers are cautioned that description of human behaviour contained on this page, details of which are exclusive to The Last Link on the Left, may be disturbing to some.
latest update - charges stayed by Crown
Philip's story |
arrest in St. Albert |
Fred Rapati interviewed
media coverage |
follow-up in the Netherlands |
second court appearance
officials clean Rapati's Volendam house |
Rapati's sole media interview
third court appearance |
fourth court appearance |
fifth court appearance
RCMP reveal new details |
trial and conviction
indignity to human body |
guilty plea
charges stayed
Dutch media coverage
For the numerous victims of sexual assaults at the hands of a St. Albert man, a decades-old quest for justice took a major step forward when on September 15th, 2008 RCMP arrested 85-year-old Anton Paul Rapati after he was spotted by an older sister of one of the children he allegedly abused.
After living some say hiding out in the Netherlands for more than fifteen years, Anton Rapati was arrested at his brother's house the day after a woman spotted the senior attending a St. Albert church.
The sister of one of Rapati's alleged victims first called the RCMP. She then called crime reporter Byron Christopher, who had been investigating allegations against Rapati since mid-October, 2007. The woman then called her brother to tell him that Rapati was back in town.
Christopher put on hold plans to fly to the Netherlands to interview Rapati.
Rapati was initially charged with indecent assault on a female, two counts of indecent assault on a male, gross indecency and buggery.
The charges stem from previous provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada, and additional charges may be pending.
The alleged assaults took place over a period of time between 1971 and 1978, involving about a half-dozen persons between the ages of seven and fifteen, in St. Albert and Edson, Alberta.
A Canada-wide warrant for Rapati was first issued on July 14th, 1993. Complaints from other victims led to further warrants being issued on November 16th, 2005 and January 18th, 2007.
Police said Rapati, once an employee of the Town of St. Albert as it was known then, gained the trust of his victim's family members that allowed him easy access to his victims.
Police believe that led to a number of children being victimised and re-victimised over a seven-year span.
Rapati is seen above after a fishing trip in the early 1970s, photographed with two boys one of them an alleged victim.
In 1993, Rapati returned to his native country. Police figured he was hiding out in the Netherlands, and it remains unknown if attempts were made to bring the man back to Canada. RCMP kept the file open in case he returned to the jurisdiction where the
assaults allegedly took place.
Crime reporter Christopher told the Last Link on the Left there are possibly further he stresses unproven allegations in the case that rank as the most shocking in his 30-year career. He says the allegations go far beyond rape and torture. He refuses to make public these details because he says there's no hard evidence, at this stage, to back up these allegations read more »
Details of the more serious allegations in the form of a formal charge have been blacked out in Edmonton Police Service documents supplied to the Last Link by Christopher. The documents also indicate delays in the initial stages of the investigation into complaints made by Philip (whose story is related below). Click on the individual documents to see the image full-sized.
At left - Philip's handwritten complaint, timed and dated 21:31 hours September 24, 2005 on a Edmonton Police Service Witness Statement Form.
Philip's statement is transcribed below:
A man by the name ---- (----) ------ would abuse me sexually 2-3 times a week, the only break I had from the abuse was if he went on a holiday. The abuse started when I was 5 going on 6 yrs old and continued until we moved from St. Albert to ----- ----- (which was 1979). Between ages 7-10 was the worst. He had access to me at school and at home, but especially took advantage of me as I walked home from school, because he worked for the Town of St. Albert in gardening, greenhouse stuff, etc ... these details I can give later.
Now to the point! This man would rape & torture me and collected my blood to strain & drink, he loved to torture animals and told me how he'd do the same to all of my family & friends. This was a constant event. Other than this constant abuse there were ...
Philip's statement goes on for another ten and-a-half pages.
At right - an Edmonton police case narrative form dated November 7th, 2005. Note the line: For unknown reasons the report was not forwarded to our Section and only came to light when the complainant called to make enquiries as to who was handling the investigation.
At left - page two of the narrative form indicating Edmonton police had forwarded the case to the RCMP.
At right - a copy of the Sexual Assault Section Case Investigation Plan & Log indicated Edmonton police forwarded the matter on November 7th, 2005.
Update: On February 21st, 2009 details of allegations of the burial of human remains were revealed see below.
Philip's story
The earliest complaints against Rapati were lodged on December 12th, 1991. Over the years, others have stepped forward with their stories.
One alleged victim, pictured above with Rapati and referred to as Philip for the purpose of concealing his identity, told the Last Link details of the abuse he allegedly suffered at the hands of the man, then in his late-forties read more »
The Last Link first interviewed Philip in the fall of 2007 about his claim that he'd been repeatedly raped and sodomized by Rapati. Philip said he initially approached the Edmonton Police Service and gave them a detailed statement but was told it was an RCMP matter.
Now a married man with three daughters, Philip continues to have nightmares about the experiences he suffered between the ages of seven and 12. He also says he has often contemplated suicide.
Describing Rapati as well-mannered and methodical, Philip said the St. Albert town gardener often freely gave small gifts to children, allowing him to "weasel his way" into their families. It was through church that the man Philip called a "smart psychopath" entered his life.
Rapati seemed to be well-respected in the community. For a child to complain about the abuse he suffered from the popular man, Philip thought it unthinkable that his concerns would be taken seriously. He kept silent for over two decades before approaching police.
Philip's family is Dutch. So is Rapati. The familiarity of common ancestry likely led to quick acceptance between the friendly man and Philip's family.
Philip alleges the abuse took place in Rapati's then small orange-coloured apartment building south of Mission Avenue in St. Albert, where the man would often speak to Philip in Dutch further cementing a bond of some sort between the two.
According to Philip, he was first raped in a town-owned greenhouse when he was six, almost turning seven.
Rapati allegedly first took a knife and slit the throat of a bunny, killing the animal. This frightened Philip. A second rabbit then had its back and throat slit this time with blood landing on the child's clothing while the animal shrieked.
Philip said the gardener ordered him to drop his pants and shorts. He obeyed. Philip said before he was raped, his attacker put a garden hose up his rectum to clean it out. Philip said the hose hurt; the rape also painful.
He said Rapati warned him not to tell his parents, or what happened to the rabbits would also happen to them.
The abuse continued.
Philip said he was often raped at Rapati's apartment after being accosted on his three-block walk home from school.
He said Rapati would "hog-tie" him and put a sock in his mouth to muffle his screams. To mask other noises, he said Rapati would turn up the radio and turn on the vacuum cleaner and place it near the door. While lying down on the floor, Philip recalled seeing shadows of people walking by in the hallway.
There were allegations of unusual torture. Philip claimed if didn't directly look at Rapati's eyes during the assaults, the man would punish the boy by keeping his eyelids open with toothpicks.
Philip alleged that Rapati would often suspend him from hooks and ropes in the bathroom of the apartment. A steel plate had been fashioned to the wall after the drywall gave way.
There were instances of bloodletting, Philip said, that involved incisions inside his rectum. Often he would pass out.
And before being dispatched home, Rapati made sure Philip was cleaned up and his clothes washed and dried after the times he had peed himself.
Philip called the abuse "fucking insane," often saying, "I wish I was making this shit up."
When Philip told Rapati "You are fucking going to hell," he said the man responded with "God is not coming to save you" and "He didn't come, where is He?"
Philip said that while he was tied up at Rapati's apartment, he was deprived of water. He recalled once crawling to the toilet bowl and putting his head down to get a drink. Philip's wife says that to this day her husband can't go anywhere without having a bottle of water handy, and her husband insists their children have water with them at all times.
Looking back now, thirty years after that horrific part of his childhood, Philip wondered if his older brother had too been exposed to Rapati's ways.
He believes the gardener was fired by the Town of St. Albert and then fled to California.
The Last Link has learned that a police officer in that state is also interested in the case, as he believes Rapati abused one of his relatives, a young male.
Sometime in 1993, Rapati moved to Volendam, a small town of 22,000 and a popular tourist attraction north of Amsterdam. It was shortly before he was expected to go to trial. It remains unknown what attempts at bringing Rapati home were made.
And it was only a chance sighting by Philip's older sister that led the RCMP to the man during a surprise visit back to the very neighbourhood where the abuse allegedly occurred.
Philip said he was extremely disappointed with how police handled his complaints. He simply does not trust them now. He does not feel they did a proper, thorough investigation, and he complained to the head of K-Division about this. He perceived police did little or nothing and gave him only "lip-service."
Saying he got the impression that police would have liked the whole matter to quietly "go away," Philip felt betrayed by them read more »
After Philip first approached St. Albert RCMP with his story in 2005, he understandably expected swift action. In his mind that did not take place. Two years after his initial complaint, he wrote a letter to the detachment's commanding officer.
In the letter, portions of which are reprinted below, Philip writes of the treatment, and the lack of information, he received from the RCMP regarding his case.
Philip has told the Last Link on the Left that when the RCMP responded to the letter he was simply paid "lip service."
The RCMP's response to Philip's allegations appear below the letter.
Note: The Last Link on the Left has removed certain portions of the email copy of the letter indicated by XXX and [...] in the interest of protecting parties concerned.
From: XXXXXX [mailto:XXXXX@XXXXX.XX]
Sent: May 11, 2007 3:22 AM
To: 'XXXXXX@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Cc: 'XXXXXX@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject: ATTENTION: Detachment Commander of St. Albert
I am XXXXXX the victim and complainant with respect to an investigation involving Anton Rapati, an individual who committed sodomy, rape and torture on myself [...] This particular investigation has been ongoing for about two years, though I believe the wanted individual has been a fugitive since the early 1990's.
I have not heard anything with regard to the progress of this case. I did receive a brief call from XXXXX XXXXXX a couple of months ago (telling me that another Canada-wide warrant for the arrest of Rapati was put into effect, only this time on my behalf). But again, this was not about the progress of the investigation. I would like to have a personal interview to update me with what is happening with the investigation, but I do not wish to be talked out of my feeling or to be intimidated by an officer who makes it clear he doesn't believe me.
So what's going on? – I can't even find out information on myself via the Privacy Act let alone about the case. I can understand that because an investigation is ongoing, the rule is to never release information. However, I am both the victim and the complainant and I think it is ludicrous to withhold my records from myself. [...] I have given plenty of statements to the investigators and should have full right to disclosure. If I am not myself under investigation, then I see no reason to withhold my own file from me.
The part that bothers me the most is that I, as the victim, have put myself through incredible emotional pain to give the police everything which might help and have not been given any information in return. I have not been informed of what is going on so that I can at least rationalize things in my own mind.
Whatever the reason I cannot tolerate it any longer. I have been extraordinarily open with police and they have been exactly the opposite with me.
Yours truly,
XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX
P.S. A copy of this letter has also been sent to the Commanding Officer K-Division Headquarters for Alberta.
Cpl. Wayne A. Oakes was contacted by the Last Link and offered the RCMP's response to the allegations contained in Philip's letter.
The issue addressed in the letter was first brought to the attention of St. Albert RCMP in early November, 2005. Within days the complainant was interviewed enabling further investigational follow-ups. The lead investigator maintained regular contact with the complainant, with contact in December 2005, and in the months of March, April, June, September and October 2006. This investigation resulted in the courts issuing a Canada Wide Warrant in January 2007, the complainant was again updated.
The letter ... was received by St. Albert RCMP on May 10, 2007. The Officer in charge and an investigator met with the complainant on May 18th. It was felt that the complainant was extremely appreciative that he was given the opportunity to express his concerns.
Our experiences of dealing with individuals impacted by traumatic events has taught our officers that in many cases, despite our best efforts and outcomes, we can never totally undo the harm that has been experienced. The Officer in charge of St. Albert Detachment would welcome the complainant to contact him should he feel the need to further discuss this matter.
Wayne A. Oakes, Cpl. Media Relations Officer, RCMP "K" Division.
Arrest in St. Albert
St. Albert RCMP Const. Greg Hawkins said it was unusual to have such an arrest made so many years after the crimes took place.
"It's quite rare, considering the time frame involved," Hawkins said. "We're talking about 30 years and then having the accused leave the country for 15 years and then return, it doesn't happen very often."
The officer explained how the offences took place.
"It is alleged that the accused had become familiar with the family and gained their trust the trust of the parents.
"And once that trust was gained he would misplace the trust so he would be left alone unsupervised with the victims and it's at that time it's alleged the assaults occurred."
After an appearance in Court of Queen's Bench in Edmonton on September 17th, 2008 Rapati was held in the Edmonton Remand Centre until his next appearance set for September 25th when an application for bail and a publication ban was expected to be heard.
Fred Rapati interviewed
When Anton Rapati first returned to St. Albert in April 2008, his brother Rapati didn't recognise him. The man sitting behind him in church one day looked much older and had grown a full beard in the fifteen years since they had last met.
Over the summer Fred and his brother kept in touch. Fred later wondered how police knew he was back in Canada read more »
CBC Edmonton aired a picture of Anton they said was taken a week before his arrest at his brother's home in St. Albert.
Media looking for Rapati's relatives didn't have to search too hard for the house, with a personalised sign in a window indicating a good place to start knocking.
Answering his door and staring down a camera, Fred stood his ground.
"Yeah you guys what do you want?" he challenged.
"I was just wondering if you were any relation to Anton ... " CBC's Briar Stewart asked.
"Yeah we are," came the quick reply from Fred's wife. "And we have nothing to tell. We didn't know anything, we know from nothing so forget it."
With that the woman tried to pull her husband out of the doorway. Fred ignored her.
"Hey now, it doesn't matter. I'm honest," he said, dispatching her back into the house.
Then Fred seemed almost eager listen to the reporters' questions and to tell them of what he knew in a high-pitched voice some found hard to understand.
Fred, a year younger than his brother, said Rapiti emigrated from the Netherlands in the 1950s and got a job with St. Albert planting gardens and cutting the grass.
Before he was to go to trial in 1993, Anton fled to Volendam. He came back after he ran out of funds.
"He kept his money here. That's why he had to come back here to get his money.
"He ... ask if he [can] come here and we say no, no. No we don't want him," Fred said.
Asked why Anton was arrested, Fred told CBC's reporters what he knew of the circumstances.
"We don't know nothing. Something with kids in the early days," Fred replied, with CBC's subtitles falling outside the 4x3 safe area.
When CTV Edmonton spoke with Fred, it was his turn to ask a question.
"How did they know he was here, I don't know," Fred said. "We don't know nothing."
Media coverage
The exclusive Last Link details of abuse suffered by a victim of Anton Rapati's were picked up locally solely by CBC Edmonton's Scott Fralick and internationally by newspapers in the Netherlands, specifically Amsterdam's De Telegraaf, the Dutch city's leading newspaper read more »
On September 19th, 2008 CBC's Fralick aired a report based on the revelations contained on this page. At the same time in the Netherlands, De Telegraaf's Johan van den Dongen was digging into Rapati's past in Volendam, the town the man lived in after he fled Canada in 1993.
In April 2008, a photographer for De Telegraaf captured Rapati preparing tea for a local amateur boys and girls soccer club whose participants range in age from six to sixteen.
The shot was taken in Rapati's home in Volendam, along the street shown above.
According to van den Dongen's article (heavily censured due to Holland's strict privacy laws), two days before news of his arrest in Canada, Rapati's home was targeted by vandals who spray painted the word 'pedophile' on his windows.
The Dutch paper interviewed one of Rapati's neighbours who thinks the man left his home because of complaints stemming from the smell coming from the house. The De Telegraaf reported police entered the home wearing masks and gloves.
Rapati's neighbour said the stench was due to the dead bodies of rats and mice ... and garbage piled to the ceiling.
CBC Edmonton's Fralick contacted De Telegraaf reporter Johan van den Dongen for details of concerns that Rapati may have had inappropriate contact with youth in the Dutch soccer club (Fralick is shown above in what might be called a David Ewasuk shot).
"Right now there's some speculation that 'Well, is my son a victim as well?' That's how people talk about it," van den Dongen told Fralick.
The Dutch newspaper reported that Antonius Paulus Fernandinus Gerardus Rapati was born in Den Haag, the nation's seat of government. Research into the the Rapati family indicates its origins lie in Poland. Anton often boasted to Philip that he was able to travel freely within Nazi-held territories during World War II.
The CBC reporter shared a similar experience to what the Last Link had in trying to uncover details of any Dutch criminal investigation into Rapati's recent activities in the Netherlands: that local police will not reveal any information whatsoever.
On October 23rd, 2007 the crime reporter Byron Christopher spoke with Frans Zuiderhoep, an officer with the Dutch police.
Zuiderhoep stated there was no registry program for sexual offenders in the Netherlands, unlike Canada. He also said he couldn't reveal if an individual there has a criminal record, or if they faced charges, citing the country's strict privacy laws.
The officer said he could possibly check with his superior, but only if the suspect's name was provided. At this point in the matter, Christopher did not offer Rapati's name and further enquiries went unanswered.
While Rapati was considered popular in Volendam, working as a gardener mirroring his life in St. Albert rumours circulated within the town that he was running from some kind of trouble.
"It's strange, of course, that he is arrested on Monday [September 15th] and already on Saturday [September 13th] there was someone kicking in his door and sprayed the word 'pedophile' on his window," van den Dongen told the CBC.
Efforts by Fralick to glean why no effort was made by the Canadian government to bring Rapati back to St. Albert to face charges had so far remained unanswered.
The De Telegraaf article van den Dongen wrote ends with "The details of the sadistic rapes are so shocking that they defy any description," suggesting Philip's allegations on this page were too graphic for even the liberal Dutch to contemplate.
Follow-up in the Netherlands
On September 23rd, 2008 Amsterdam's De Telegraaf followed up on the story of Anton Rapati, detailing his life in the town of Volendam read more »
One neighbour reported Rapati was a first-class miser, so cheap that he did not have gas or electricity connected to his home. He took showers at the local football club and boasted he booked air flights on September 11th, a date other travellers avoided resulting in cheap seat prices. It was on that date in 2008 when Rapati returned to St. Albert.
In addition to visiting Germany and Romania, Rapati had also travelled to Alaska. The neighbour was also sure the man returned to Canada at least once a year.
The article published in De Telegraaf stated that local police have no record of outstanding charges against Rapati, but neighbours have suggested he was on the run.
"At the beginning of the month he was completely hysterical and wanted to get away as soon as possible," said a man who seemed to know Rapati well.
The subject of the condition of Rapati's house was brought up at a meeting of the Edam-Volendam town council. Officials said they were waiting for word from Canadian law enforcement before considering cleaning the place up.
The paper said Rapati's house on Kathammerstraat was so filthy that neighbours are barely able to live beside it due to the stench.
"It's unbelievable, really unbelievable," Edam-Volendam alderman Wim Runderkamp said.
Update: see officials clean Rapati's Volendam house below.
Second court appearance
Anton Rapati, represented by defence lawyer Mona Duckett, made a brief appearance in an Edmonton courtroom on September 25th, 2008.
The matter was put over, with Rapati next set to appear in St. Albert Provincial Court on October 6th, 2008 for election and plea.
Rapati was to be held in Edmonton's Court of Queen's Bench on October 17th, 2008 when an application for bail and possibly a publication ban was expected to be entered.
Officials clean Rapati's Volendam house
On September 29th, 2008 officials from the Dutch town of Volendam entered Anton Rapati's house at 12 Kathammerstraat and set about emptying its contents into a garbage bin on the street read more »
There was no word if contact was made between the Town of Volendam and RCMP in Canada prior to the house being cleaned up.
Rapati's sole media interview
Anton Rapati gave his sole media interview when crime reporter Byron Christopher met with the accused child-rapist at the Edmonton Remand Centre on October 3rd, 2008 read more »
Rapati told Christopher he would plead 'not guilty' when he appears in court. In a 30-minute meeting, the 85-year-old maintained his innocence and told Christopher he didn't know why police would charge him.
He confirmed that the RCMP picked him up at his brother's place in St. Albert in September. He said a Mountie came to the door and told him he was going for a ride. Rapati said he was taken to the RCMP station in St. Albert and charged.
In January 2007 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Rapati after an Edmonton man, now in his early 40s, told police he had been repeatedly raped and tortured by Rapati. The attacks allegedly happened in the 1970s, starting when the child was six.
The former gardener for the City of St. Albert had been living in Volendam, Netherlands for the past 15 years. He told Christopher he had no idea police were looking for him. He said while living in the Netherlands he was never questioned by either Canadian or Dutch law enforcement.
Rapati also claims he freely travelled to Canada many times. He said he flew to Canada once or twice a year but was never detained or questioned by the authorities despite a Canada-wide warrant for his arrest.
The senior also confirmed details of published reports that he frequenty travelled to Germany and Romania without interference.
Police said Rapati fled Canada in 1993, just before he was set to go to trial on charges of sexually assaulting children. Rapati said he was under the impression those charges had been dealt with.
Anton Rapati's World War Two travel documents
Courtesy Johan Van Den Dongen of Amsterdam's De Telegraaf
Click on images to view full-sized
Rapati described his health as good. He says he was being treated well at the Remand Centre, although he said when he was first put into the detention facility he had to stand for ten hours. He told the reporter he complained to guards that he got better treatment when he was a prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp.
Rapati also talked about the jobs he had in Alberta and British Columbia, and that he had been involved with the Boy Scouts in both provinces.
Note: after this interview was conducted, reporter Christopher was "warned off" by Rapati's lawyer, Mona Duckett.
Third court appearance
More alleged victims came forward to tell police Anton Rapati raped them when they were young.
At least two of the alleged victims appeared in court in St. Albert on October 6th, 2008 where 85-year-old Rapati appeared by way of a video link.
Rapati stood beside a sheriff at the Remand Centre in Edmonton when he spoke with Judge Ms. M.J. Burch on camera.
Crown prosecutor Terry Hoffman told Burch he had just been given two or three additional binders on the morning of Rapati's appearance, indicating that more charges could be pending.
The new information prompted Rapati's lawyer to ask that Rapati's appearance today be put off for two weeks. The former gardener was supposed to enter a plea, but that was now scheduled to take place on October 20th.
Outside the courthouse, eight people alleged victims of Rapati or relatives of alleged victims shared stories about Rapati and hugged one another. One man said he put his complaint in two weeks ago. An elderly woman wept. The group demanded to know why Rapati was allowed to freely travel to Canada when warrants had been issued for his arrest.
On October 3rd Anton Rapati told crime reporter Byron Christopher he had been to Canada many times in the last 15 years, sometimes twice a year and he was not once detained or questioned by the authorities when he was here. Rapati maintained he harmed no children and would plead not guilty.
Fourth court appearance
The 85-year-old accused child-rapist was in Court of Queen's Bench in Edmonton on the morning of October 17th, 2008 to hear that his application for bail had been "deferred" or put over for a while.
Anton Rapati was scheduled to go to trial on February 11th and 12th, 2009 on sexual charges that he should have faced 15 years ago. Police said the former St. Albert gardener fled Canada before he could be tried.
Justice Sterling Sanderman said because Rapati failed to show up for trial in 1993, the man blew his chance of being tried by judge and jury. The judge said Rapati had no choice now but to be tried by judge alone.
In the past few years, other alleged victims have come forward ... alleging that Rapati raped them as well. The main complainant, a 42-year-old Edmonton man, claimed Rapati held him against his will and tortured him. Rapati won't go to trial on those matters until May 2009 at the earliest.
Rapati appeared in court sporting a standard blue jumper issued by the Edmonton Remand Centre and a fresh bandaid on the top of his head. Instead of confining Rapati to one of the holding cells, courtroom sheriffs allowed the senior to rest on a comfortable chair.
No alleged victims or their supporters were in court.
Crown Prosecutor Terry Hoffman said he's not positive of the number of alleged victims. He indicated the file will be handled by a senior crown prosecutor in Vegreville, Greg Marchant.
Marchant said the Rapati file is a big one. He said he just recently got a box of new evidence.
Rapati was due to make another court appearance on Monday, October 20th this time in St. Albert but that matter was expected to be again put over.
-- report provided by Byron Christopher
Fifth court appearance
On October 20th, 2008, when the Anton Rapati matter was in court, the senior wasn't.
Rapati did not appear in a St. Albert courtroom either in person or by video link from the Edmonton Remand Centre but instead a judge, a Crown prosecutor and defence lawyer Mona Duckett discussed a "pre-trial conference" set to take place in the small city's provincial courthouse for March 6th, 2009.
Such meetings are used by justice officials to sort out procedural matters relating to a case.
According to one observer, the appearance was so quick all those involved could have double-parked and gotten away with it.
It was also learned that Rapati's second trial, involving allegations made after those that sparked the 1993 charges, would start on on May 4th, 2009, again in St. Albert.
RCMP reveal new details
On October 21st, 2008 St. Albert RCMP media relations officer Cpl. Ted Soltys said investigators wanted to extradite Anton Rapati from the Netherlands but the Crown didn't act on their request.
The revelation was made in a response to crime reporter Byron Christopher's questioning of aspects of the RCMP's handling of the case read more »
Christopher asked if the RCMP had travelled to the Netherlands to locate and interview Anton Rapati after a warrant was issued for his arrest in January 2007.
Soltys responded in an e-mail: "No, investigation eventually determined he was in the Netherlands and an extradition request was made to the Crown. The Crown did not extradite."
The statement seemed to go a long way to explain how Rapati was able to travel freely in and out of Canada in the time since he failed to appear in court in 1993 to face indecent assault charges.
The matter of Rapati's ability to visit a country where three nation-wide warrants were out for his arrest was first probed by CBC Edmonton read more »
That Amsterdam's De Telegraaf stated Rapati was able to travel freely in and out of Canada caught the attention of the CBC Edmonton reporter who was trying to determine what efforts were made to bring the man back to St. Albert to face criminal charges.
RCMP first issued a Canada-wide warrant for Rapati on July 14th, 1993.
CBC's Scott Fralick contacted John Thompson of the MacKenzie Institute, an independent non-profit think tank with a focus on terrorism, political instability and organised crime.
"The problem was ... the RCMP and Canada Customs and Immigration back in the 1990s didn't match their databases," Thompson said.
At the time, customs officers did not have access to criminal records on their computer systems.
"We've got a lot of holes in our system," Thompson said. "There's not nearly as much cross-checking as there should be."
As to who could be held responsible for Rapati's easy entry into a country where police were looking for him, Thompson offered two suspects of his own.
"I would point at the federal government first and the provincial government second."
Rapati was eventually nabbed after the older sister of one of his alleged victims spotted him in church and alerted RCMP.
Christopher also questioned if RCMP searched Rapati's residence in Volendam (north of Amsterdam) for possible evidence after the man was picked up and charged in St. Albert.
"The St. Albert RCMP, in regards to the Rapati matter, investigated crimes which were all considered historical in nature from the outset of the case," Soltys wrote.
"The matters in hand occurred within the Alberta courts' jurisdiction and occurred in the 1970s many years before Mr. Rapati moved to and resided in the Netherlands. There would have to be a link to evidence from the 1970s to justify a search warrant here or in Europe. Police to date have no evidentiary link to any of Rapati's past residences."
Soltys also wrote Christopher that "shortly after the recent arrest of Mr. Rapati, another victim has come forward and the investigation on this matter is continuing. It is believed that the media coverage of this matter influenced a 6th victim to come forward."
Trial and conviction
On February 11th, 2009 Anton Paul Rapati appeared in an Edmonton courtroom and pleaded not guilty to the two counts of gross indecency, two counts of indecent assault on a male, indecent assault and buggery charges read out against him.
Appearing frail, the 85-year-old Rapati walked slowly into the courtroom and had trouble standing. Sporting a bushy white beard, he sat in the prisoner box wearing a hearing aid as his scheduled two-day trial began read more »
It was revealed that the initial charges Rapati faced came from four complainants who were members of the same family.
A preliminary hearing on the charges had already taken place shortly before Rapati fled to the Netherlands in 1993.
Court heard that the accused had befriended a recently separated woman with eight children in 1970. When the woman was working a night shift, Rapati would come over to help the children with homework.
A brother, 49, a sister, 47, and two other brothers described Rapati as a good friend of the family. But when their mother was at work, the abuse started with sexual touching and progressed from there.
A publication ban prevents the identification of the alleged victims.
One of the brothers took the stand telling the court that he was assaulted by Rapati dozens of times as a young teenager. He broke down when he testified the assaults caused him "a lot of shame and a lot of anguish."
The man also said he felt responsible for what happened to his sister and two brothers because he had introduced Rapati to his family. He first met Rapati in the park across from the family's home when he was 12. The St. Albert government gardener was installing flower boxes at the time.
He testified Rapati used to take him camping and hiking in the mountains, with weekend spent at a cabin.
It began with hugs and kisses, he told the court, and then progressed to sexual encounters that ranged from masturbation to oral sex to attempted anal intercourse.
"Did you want to have this relationship?" Crown prosecutor Greg Marchant asked him.
"No, not that way," came the man's reply, crying as he answered.
His sister testified that Rapati assaulted her for about four years, starting when she was 10. Rapati had asked her to promise to keep the assaults to herself, saying "this is our secret" and that he would "get her" if she told.
"Every time he came over, every chance he could get," she said. "It was constant."
The woman said that when she finally went to police in 1991 to report the abuse, she was so embarrassed she had to turn her back to the officer, looking instead at the wall when she gave her statement.
"It's not like I thought of him as a monster," she told the court. "He's a pedophile." As she testified, Rapati could be seen restraining a small laugh.
A second brother testified he went camping with Rapati and a group of boys when he was between eight and 11. He said Rapati played a "game" with him involving mutual fondling.
The youngest brother testified Rapati took him to his apartment when he was six or seven years old. There they engaged in mutual oral sex on three occasions during a half-year period.
The Crown concluded its case on the first day of the trial and Rapati's lawyer, Mona Duckett, said no defence evidence would be called.
In her closing arguments, Duckett said it was clear from the testimony of the older brother that the alleged abuse took place. However, she suggested that charges stemming from the abuse of the sister be dropped as the girl's testimony had changed over time.
"The evidence ... is not of the quality that sustains criminal conviction," Duckett stated.
The remark caused the girl to require aid from victim services staff in the courtroom.
Crown prosecutor Marchant acknowledged the length of time introduced by Rapati's absence from Canada caused problems for the case against him, but tempered that with the severity of the allegations.
"Memory is a funny thing. Remembering traumatic events is something most people can do," he said.
Marchant recommended a sentence of seven years in prison while Duckett recommended a term of about two years.
Decision
Justice Sterling Sanderman found Anton Paul Rapati guilty of buggery, indecent assault and gross indecency in relation to charges involving the older brother. He was acquitted of two charges of indecent assault and one count of gross indecency against the three younger siblings.
Sanderman ruled the evidence of the two middle children was stronger at trial than it had been at a preliminary hearing or in their initial police statements. Their testimony revealed a potential for accidental collaboration, he suggested.
He also acquitted Rapati of a sex charge involving a fourth sibling due to the evidence falling short.
Sentencing
Sanderman sentenced Rapati to a four-year prison term. However, Rapati received 10 months credit for time spent in pretrial custody in the Edmonton Remand Centre and 13 months credit for being elderly, leaving him with 25 months left to serve.
The senior's advanced age would cause him to have a difficult time in prison where he would be at the mercy of younger inmates.
Rapati was also ordered to submit his DNA to the National DNA Data Bank. He will be a monitored sex offender for the rest of his life.
In his ruling Sanderman noted that Rapati had "groomed" the older boy who was 12 when the abuse started.
The teen "endured the sexual acts because it was an avenue of escape that he believed he needed," Sanderman said.
"By enduring the abuse, he wasn't consenting to it. He was taken advantage of. Mr. Rapati held all of the power."
The abuse sarted with kissing and hugging and then progressed to more involved acts.
Sanderman noted the testimony of the victim, calling it "compelling" and "heart-wrenching," and said he obviously felt "grossly betrayed" by Rapati.
CBC Edmonton's Scott Fralick showing the statement on camera.
Outside court the family at the heart of the case broke a decades-long silence when they issued a handwritten statement.
We hope that by coming forward to the police and facing Anton Rapati for sexually abusing us for all those years, that this may save one child from becoming a victim or give other adults the courage to come forward if they were abused by anyone.
No one should have to suffer the fear and shame in silence as we have.
Rapati turned 86 on February 23rd. The 25 months he received likely amounts to a life sentence for the senior who had yet to face another trial for a second set of charges on May 4th, 2009.
Indignity to human body
Allegations later surfaced regarding convicted sex-offender Anton Rapati that involve the burying of human body parts read more »
Edmonton Police Service documents obtained by crime reporter Byron Christopher reveal that a man, now 42, told police in 2005 that Rapati forced him to help bury the human remains of small children near the community north of Edmonton in the 1970s.
The allegations were first alluded to by Christopher when RCMP arrested Rapati in September 2008. Christopher has now shared the documents with The Last Link on the Left and Amsterdam's De Telegraaf newspaper.
The accusations come from a man who claims Rapati sodomised him when he was a young boy. Rapati is set to appear in court on May 4th, 2009 to answer to those charges. The full story of 'Philip' has been detailed earlier on this page.
De Telegraaf, with a circulation of about 800,000, reported the allegations in a full-page story published February 21st, 2009. The story was headlined: 'What A Ratbag.'
Reporter Johan van den Dongen brought Dutch readers up to date with details of Rapati's recent conviction on his first set of charges and revealed that the man may have been involved in the burial of human remains.
The newspaper reported that when Anton was 16, he became distraught when his parents served up his pet rabbit as supper. A relative of Anton who told the story to van den Dongen was unaware of a 1970s claim that Rapati had killed rabbits in front of a 6-year-old boy before ordering the terrified child to drop his trousers and briefs.
Travel documents indicated that in 1940 Rapati worked on a farm in then East Germany and was arrested by the Nazis in 1942.
The man first applied to live in New Zealand after World War II but settled instead in Canada in 1957. After he returned to the Netherlands to avoid charges of child sexual abuse brought against him in the early 1990s, Rapati made frequent visits to Romania and Germany.
De Telegraaf's van den Dongen quoted reporter Byron Christopher as saying the allegations of the burial of human body parts was the most shocking story he has unearthed during his 30-year career.
Christopher also told the reporter that if Philip made up the story with such detail he should immediately start another career and move to Hollywood.
In documents exclusive to The Last Link on the Left, Philip outlines a secret he has kept for more than thirty years: that he watched Anton Rapati bury at least one child just outside of St. Albert in the early 1970s.
RCMP say there's no record of any missing children in the Edmonton area from that time.
Philip claims Rapati told him the children were not from the Edmonton area and that he'd never know where they were from.
An Edmonton Police Service summary of the allegations Philip made in a 13-page handwritten statement provides details of the allegations.
In the handwritten statement, Philip describes gruesome details of the contents of plastic garbage bags he helped Rapati carry to a spot near a river.
"I turned & saw the bag slumped over and I recall seeing a detached head partly out of the bag. I stopped & stared ..."
Philip writes of how Rapati "opened the bag a little more he took an arm partly out and made it wave at me, he made the hand move up and down to wave at me. He laughed at me ... "
Rapati told Philip that his fingerprints were all over the plastic bags and warned the young boy that should he tell the police anything police would think he was responsible and would charge him.
Philip said when he went to EPS with his story in 2005 he thought he might be charged himself.
After Philip filed his complaint with Edmonton police they referred the matter to St. Albert RCMP who told him they looked into his allegations but didn't find anything despite using ground penetrating radar. Police told Christopher they searched several locations.
When contacted by De Telegraaf's reporter for the February 21st story, Philip said he continues to stand by his accusations despite police assertions no remains were found. Philip told The Last Link on the Left he's relieved the allegations are now public.
Reaction to the de Telegraaf story was swift with scores of people leaving comments of anger and disgust on the paper's website. Many say they're outraged at both Dutch and Canadian authorities for allowing Rapati to travel so freely after being charged with raping children.
Reporter Christopher said Rapati's story was like a Rubik's cube of sexual deviancy.
The police documents Christopher supplied to The Last Link on the Left and De Telegraaf have been reproduced on this web page.
Details identifying Philip's true identity and the specific locations of where he alleges the burials took place have been blacked out by The Last Link on the Left.
Note that the page is extremely large in file size and may be slow in loading.
It should also be noted that Anton Rapati has not been charged with offering an indignity to a human body.
Earlier this month Rapati was given 25 months for buggery, indecent assault and gross indecency for attacks on children. The sentence was in addition to the time Rapati had spent at the Remand Center waiting trial. Justice Sterling Sanderman said he would have given Rapati a longer sentence had it not been for his age.
Rapati turned 86 on February 23rd, 2009 and will be eligible for parole next summer.
He will qualify for release into the community (likely a half-way house) on July 1st, 2010, according to Guy Campeau, National Director of Communications for Corrections Canada in Ottawa.
Guilty plea
On May 4th, 2009 Anton Rapati appeared in Courtroom #1 of the St. Albert courthouse to face one count of indecent assault for fondling a boy under the age of 12 in the early 1970s.
What was scheduled to be a two-day trial ended quickly when Rapati entered a guilty plea. The senior received an additional four months of jail time.
The added sentence will be served concurrently, keeping Rapati's eligibilty date for release into the community (likely a half-way house) as July 1st, 2010.
Rapati was set to next appear in court on May 20th, 2009 for another scheduled two-day trial in connection with another count of indecent assault.
Charges stayed
On May 12th, 2009 the man whose family helped RCMP snare the now-convicted sex offender learned that charges against Rapati based on his accusations had been stayed by the Crown prosecutor's office.
Excerpts of letter sent to 'Philip' from Crown prosecutor Gregory Marchant.
'Philip' was later couriered a three-page letter from Crown prosecutor Gregory Marchant outlining reasons for the decision.
Rapati's trial for one count of indecent assault, set to begin May 20th, 2009 has been put on hold. The Crown has one year to decide whether to proceed if additional evidence comes to light, or simply abandon the case.
Philip said he would be contacting justice officials to have the Crown's decision re-considered.
Dutch media coverage
In the Netherlands, the case of Anton Rapati was documented closely by De Telegraaf and its online sister paper WebRegio.nl.
For the interest of Dutch readers, their coverage can be found here (links open in new tab or window):
- September 19, 2008 - Medewerker RKAV Volendam in Canada opgepakt voor pedofilie
- September 22, 2008 - Volendamse pedo in Canada opgepakt
- September 24, 2008 - Volendam in maag met woning pedofiel
- September 26, 2008 - 'Hij is gewoon echt een pedofiel' [video]
- October 10, 2008 - Anton Rapati pleit onschuldig voor Canadese rechtbank
- February 13, 2009 - Rapati veroordeeld tot 25 maanden cel
- February 14, 2009 - Kinderverkrachter 25 maanden cel in
- February 21, 2009 - Wat een viezerik!
- May 17, 2009 - Bejaarde pedofiel ziet vrijheid gloren
- May 18, 2009 - Rapati mogelijk toch eerder vrij
Enquiries regarding material contained herein should be directed through the contact link at the bottom of this page.
This material is protected by copyright. Further use of the material requires permission, in advance, before publication or broadcast. Linking on the internet directly to this page is permitted provided such practice adheres to
conditions as outlined on the About This Site page referenced below.
The Last Link thanks Byron Christopher, Scott Fralick and 'Philip' for material used in this report.